Design Step 3
Project Description: During this step my group and I had to determine which path we would go forward with during our project. We began to do this by narrowing our view to 3 main options and then assigned a series of values to each pertaining to 6 different criteria, at the end of this process we chose the one with the greatest score. In addition, we also did further research into the supply chains and logistical systems that would be at play, should our product be introduced into the market space.
Individual Decision Matrix: Attached below is my own determination of the effectiveness between the three concepts based upon the criteria of: CO2 capture, particulate matter filtration, sound dampening, cost effectiveness, ease of manufacturing, and durability. By my own determination, Concept 3 was the best of the three options.
Individual Decision Matrix: Attached below is my own determination of the effectiveness between the three concepts based upon the criteria of: CO2 capture, particulate matter filtration, sound dampening, cost effectiveness, ease of manufacturing, and durability. By my own determination, Concept 3 was the best of the three options.
Team Decision Matrix: This document shows my groups combined consideration of the criteria, taken from the averages of each of our own decision matrices. Inevitably, our group determined that we would pursue concept 3 as it had the highest score.
Life Cycle Assessment: The document attached details the manufacture, transportation, and usage of our product. Additionally, within we weigh the cost in dollars and carbon emissions against the projected positive effect of our product on the environment.
Concepts:
- Design Matrix: a grid that organizes separate concepts to allow for more complete and unbiased consideration.
- Weight: assigned importance of each criteria as the sum of the product review, used to determine objective value of each concept's merit.